|
Correlation
Coefficients
If you decide to invest some money in stock indices
then the first problem you should think about is the
index correlation. If two indices are highly correlated
there is no sense to buy both of them. It is equivalent
buying one index. Diversification effect will be very
small.
We calculated the correlation coefficients for 11 US
stock indices:
Dow Jones Industrial Average
Dow Jones Transportation Average
Dow Jones Utility Average
NASDAQ 100
SP 500
SP MidCap
Silver and Gold Index
Oil Index
Semiconductor Index
Russell 2000
Biotech Index
The definitions
of the average returns, risk, and correlation coefficients
one can find in the e-book How
to win the stock market game. We have studied
the index histories for the period from 1985 to 2001.
For some indices (semi and biotech) the history is shorter.
The figure on the left shows the correlation coefficients
between the Dow Jones Industrial Average and other indices.
Correlation coefficients have been calculated for various
returns: from 1 to 64 days.
We define
m day return as
return = (P(i+m)/P(i) -1)*100%
where P(i) is the closing index price at day i.
One can see
that Gold and Biotech indices correlate very little
with the Dow. For very short term returns the Gold-Dow
correlation coefficient is close to zero. The highest
correlation coefficients have been found for Dow-SP
500, Dow-DJTA, Dow-Russell 2000, and Dow-SP MidCap.
It was a surprise that the Dow correlates relatively
highly with the NASDAQ 100 index.
There is a
strong time dependence of the Dow - Biotech correlation
coefficient. For 20 day returns (and longer) there is
very little correlation between these indices.
The next table
shows the correlation coefficients between all indices
for 20 day returns.
| |
DJIA |
DJTA |
DJUA |
NASDAQ
100 |
SP
500 |
MidCap |
Gold |
Oil |
Semi |
Russell
2000 |
Biotech |
| DJIA |
1 |
0.77 |
0.42 |
0.68 |
0.94 |
0.77 |
0.21 |
0.56 |
0.44 |
0.72 |
0.22 |
| DJTA |
|
1 |
0.25 |
0.54 |
0.75 |
0.65 |
0.12 |
0.38 |
0.33 |
0.66 |
0.04 |
| DJUA |
|
|
1 |
0.15 |
0.42 |
0.27 |
0.00 |
0.33 |
-0.07 |
0.19 |
0.12 |
| NASDAQ
100 |
|
|
|
1 |
0.81 |
0.77 |
0.09 |
0.28 |
0.80 |
0.81 |
0.56 |
| SP
500 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
0.86 |
0.13 |
0.52 |
0.60 |
0.79 |
0.35 |
| MidCap |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
0.18 |
0.42 |
0.70 |
0.90 |
0.55 |
| Gold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
0.31 |
0.11 |
0.22 |
0.22 |
| Oil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
0.20 |
0.43 |
0.12 |
| Semi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
0.73 |
0.53 |
| Russell
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
0.69 |
| Biotech |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
One can see
that the Dow Jones Utility Average (DJUA) and the Gold/Silver
Index have very little correlation with other indices.
Utilities are even negatively correlated with the semiconductor
index. The highest correlation is between DJIA and SP
500. One can conclude that it is not a good idea to
have these two indices in the portfolio together. They
are practically moving together.
Efficient
Two Index Portfolio
Now we consider
how to build the efficient investment portfolio using
two indices. We will suppose that an investor wants
to buy two stock indices to have minimal risk/return
ratio. In other words an investor wants to have optimal
risk with a good return.
Suppose an
investor spends X part of his/her capital to buy index
#1 and (1-X) part of his capital to buy index #2. Example:
X = 0.2
(20 %)
1-X = 0.8 (80 %)
For calculation
we will use 20 day return data. Using other time scale
does not change the results significantly. Let us introduce
some parameters:
r1 is the
average monthly return of index 1
r2 is the average monthly return of index 2
s1 is risk (the standard deviation of the returns) of
index 1
s2 is risk (the standard deviation of the returns) of
index 2
c12 is the correlation coefficient for the returns of
these indices
r is the average return of investment portfolio
s is risk (the standard deviation of the returns r)
of investment portfolio
For calculations of r and s one can use simple equations:
r =
X * r1 + (1-X) * r2
s 2
= X 2 * r1 2 + (1-X)
2 * r2 2 + 2 * X *
(1-X) * r1 * r2 * c12
The next table
shows the average returns, risk and risk to return ratios
for the studied indices. We select the time period form
1994 to December of 2001 when all indices exist: the
biotech and semiconductor indices were introduced recently.
Due to dividends we also added 0.35% to 20 day returns
of DJUA.
| |
Average
20 day return, % |
Risk
(standard deviation) |
Risk.Return |
| DJIA |
1.12
|
4.6
|
4.1
|
| DJTA |
0.73
|
6.3
|
8.6
|
| DJUA |
1.10
|
4.4
|
4.0
|
| NASDAQ
100 |
1.79
|
9.5
|
5.3
|
| SP
500 |
1.09
|
4.5
|
4.1
|
| MidCap |
1.26
|
5.0
|
4.0
|
| Gold |
-0.27
|
9.5
|
-
|
| Oil |
0.89
|
4.8
|
5.4
|
| Semi |
2.20
|
13.4
|
6.1
|
| Russell
2000 |
0.78
|
5.7
|
7.3
|
| Biotech |
2.79
|
12.5
|
4.5
|
It is interesting to note that for this period of time
the best risk/return ratio was for the SP MidCap and
DJUA indices. The highest return was for Biotech
index but risk of using this index is high. The worst
risk/return ratio was for the Dow Jones Transportation
Average.
Using
equations showed above we have calculated the risk/return
ratios for all index pairs for different values of X
from 0 to 1. The figure in the left shows example of
calculations. It presents dependencies of the risk/return
ratios for various combinations of DJIA and other indices.
The best combinations (lowest risk/return ratios) for
this period of time were observed for:
50% DJIA and
50% DJUA (20 day return = 1.1%)
75% DJIA and 25% Biotech (20 day return = 1.5%)
In the table
below we show some index combinations with low values
of risk/return ratios.
| Index
1 |
Index
2 |
minimal
risk/return |
corresponding
20 day return |
optimal
X
(part of index 1) |
| DJIA |
DJUA |
3.41 |
1.1 |
0.5 |
| DJIA |
Biotech |
3.35 |
1.5 |
0.75 |
| DJUA |
NASDAQ
100 |
3.41 |
1.3 |
0.7 |
| DJUA |
SP
500 |
3.42 |
1.1 |
0.5 |
| DJUA |
MidCap |
3.17 |
1.2 |
0.5 |
| DJUA |
Biotech |
3.16 |
1.5 |
0.75 |
| SP
500 |
Biotech |
3.53 |
1.5 |
0.75 |
| MidCap |
Oil |
3.68 |
1.6 |
0.8 |
| MidCap |
Biotech |
3.64 |
1.5 |
0.7 |
| Oil |
Biotech |
3.64 |
1.5 |
0.7 |
Notes
We have shown the method of quick building the efficient
investment portfolio. We must mention that the results
depend on the input parameters: average returns,
risk, and correlation coefficients. The last two parameters
are rather stable and do not depend much on the period
of time considered. The returns are function of time.
If an investor wants to make similar calculations he
must select the time frame as large as possible.
|