|
Maturity
and Money-ness Effect on Bid-Ask Spreads of
Equity Index Options
Asitha Kodippili
Fayetteville State University
akodippili@uncfsu.edu
Abstract:
An empirical analysis of bid-ask spread (BAS) for S&P
500 options based on a broad sample of real-time market quotes
is performed. To empirically establish the maturity and money-ness
effect on the BAS of equity options, I performed a preliminary
investigation using graphical analysis. Percentage BAS of option
contracts depends on time to maturity and money-ness in non-linear
manner. Percentage spreads of equity options are found to be
negatively related to the contract maturity and positively related
to the contract money-ness. I then established the effect of
money-ness and maturity on the percentage BAS through ordinary
least squares regression analysis. These models can easily be
used to calculate profit-loss calculations of option trading
strategies.
1. Introduction
Unlike the typical bid-ask spread for equities bid-ask spread
for options can exceed the value of the option itself for out-of-the-money
contracts and generally much higher than the bid-ask spread
for equities. As a result, bid-ask spread is especially important
in the context of options trading. However, there are a few
empirical studies that examine bid-ask spreads for equity options
[1, 2, 5] and index options [3, 4]. These studies are mostly
based on few liquid contracts. For example; Chan, Chung and
Johnson [1] have employed a matching sample, where in each day,
the stock is matched with its most active call (put) option.
Effectively, for each stock, only one option contract is considered
for a day. As opposed to those studies, this empirical study
of bid-ask spread is based on a broad sample (10% in-the-money
to 10% out-of-the-money) of real-time market quotes for call
and put options contracts for S&P 500 index options. The
objective of present work is to find out significance of money-ness
and maturity as explanatory variables in variation in bid-ask
spread, and obtain a suitable model(s) to estimate average bid-ask
spread as a function of those variables.
2. Notations
and Definitions :
S
Index value K: Strike
Price : m = K/S
Money-ness. T : Time to maturity
Compute the percentage bid-ask spread for each contract by .
3. Empirical
Analysis
To empirically establish the money-ness and maturity effects
on the bid-ask spread of S&P call option contracts, we first
carry out a preliminary investigation of the relation between
contract money-ness, maturity and the percentage bid-ask spread
using graphical analysis. We then establish the effect of money-ness
and maturity on the bid-ask spread through regression analysis.
In order to consider most liquid contracts, we drop options
contracts that are more than 10% -in or out-of-the money. To
see variation related to different money-ness and maturity,
we construct a panel by sorting the data into 21 money-ness
groups: 0.90,0.91,
, 1.09, 1.10 and six maturity groups:
less than 30 days, 30 to 60 days, 60 to 90 days, 90 to 180 days,
and 180 to 360 days. The reported spreads are calculated by
averaging the spreads over all the listed contracts during the
sample period May 2003 to August 2003.

It is evident
from the graph that a single model will not give us good estimates
for the percentage bid-ask spread for all maturities and money-ness
values. Therefore, I obtain three simple models as a function
of money-ness for the maturity categories namely between 15
to 45 days, 45 to 90 and above 90 days.
|
Time
to maturity in days
|
Model
for % bid-ask spread
|
|
|
20.39102 - 42.81842*M + 22.50101*M*M
|
|
|
4.64452 - 10.09362*M + 5.51207*M*M
|
|
|
2.29319 - 4.88238*M + 2.62525*M*M
|
These models
can be used to estimate percentage bid-ask spread for S&P
500 call options and hence profit-loss calculations of option
trading strategies. The table below show estimate of percentage
bid-ask spread for a few money-ness values.
|
Money-ness
|
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
2.1%
|
3.0%
|
2.4%
|
|
1.00
|
7.4%
|
6.3%
|
3.6%
|
|
1.05
|
24%
|
12.3%
|
6.1%
|
References
[1] Chan, K.C., Chung. P., and Johnson, H: The intraday behavior
of bid-ask spreads for NYSE stocks and CBOE options,
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 30(3), 329-346
(1995).
[2] Chung, K.H., and Zhao, X.: Intraday variation in the bid-ask
spread: Evidence after market reform, Journal of Financial
Research 26, 191-206 (2003).
[3] Fahlenbrach, R., and Sandas, P.: Bid-ask spread and inventory
risk: Evidence from the FTSE-100 index options market,
EFA 2003 annual conference paper, No.872 (2003)
[4] George, T., and Longstaff, F.: Bid-ask spreads and trading
activity in the S&P 100 index options market, Journal of
Financial and Quantitative Analysis 28, 381-397 (1993).
[5] Mayhew, S.: Competition, market structure, and bid-ask spreads
in stock option markets, Journal of Finance, 57, 2, 931-958
(2002).
|